Design Reuse
Search EETimes
Silicon IP Verification IP Software IP Wanted IP !!! Free Download IP Analytics (Restricted Access) FPGA Board / Kit Design Services Foundries Main IP/SoC Products Embedded Systems Design Platform / Structured ASIC Foundries FPGA / CPLD Fabless / IDM Deals Legal Business Financial Results People ESL Design Commentary / Analysis Main Silicon IP / SoC Verification IP FPGA / CPLD Embedded Systems Design Platform / Structured ASIC ESL Design ESL Design Standards & Best Practice Structured ASIC Verification IP Main On Cores Embedded Systems EDA Tools IP Cores Tool Demos D&R Partners Research / Market Reports Events Calendar Webcasts / Podcasts Online Bookstore



SystemVerilog Reference Verification Methodology: VMM Adoption


Latest Articles

Most Popular (Updated Daily)

Thomas Anderson, Janick Bergeron and Eduard Cerny (Synopsys, Inc.) Alan Hunter and Andrew Nightingale (ARM Ltd.)
(09/04/2006 8:22 AM EDT), EE Times
 
The larger and more complex that system-on-chip (SoC) designs grow, the more verification dominates the development process. In fact, effective design reuse puts even more pressure on the verification team to reduce their part of the schedule. The best solution to this dilemma is the adoption and deployment of a reuse-oriented, coverage-driven methodology that yields more efficient verification, while also increasing the likelihood of first-silicon success.

This is the last in a series of four articles outlining a reference verification methodology that meets these goals for both RTL and system-level verification. This methodology is enabled by the SystemVerilog hardware design and verification language standard and is documented in the Verification Methodology Manual (VMM) for SystemVerilog, a book jointly authored by ARM and Synopsys. This article focuses on ways to adopt the VMM methodology and deploy it quickly throughout an entire SoC project.

Click here to read more ...





   

Add your Opinion

   

 

E-mail This Article Printer-Friendly Page



list: -1223340354.74 seconds
detail: 0.000262022018433 seconds
prov: 0.000375032424927 seconds
end_new